How Peter Prinsley votes
Peter Prinsley voted the same way as their party in 100% of the votes where parties gave instructions. In 0 of those 211 votes, they went the other way.
What does this mean?
Parties tell their MPs how to vote. Most MPs usually follow that. A high score is normal and says nothing about whether an MP is good or bad. We only count votes where parties gave instructions, not free votes. Words explained
Recent votes
| Date | Vote | They voted | Compared with party |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Sep | End of life for terminally ill adults: the first main vote | For | Free vote |
| 11 Sep | A vote to end a debate | For | Free vote |
| 4 Sep | Motion to sit in private | Against | Same as party |
| 2 Sep | Voting and elections: the final vote | For | Same as party |
| 2 Sep | Voting and elections: a proposed change | Against | Same as party |
| 2 Sep | Voting and elections: a proposed change | Against | Same as party |
Declared interests
MPs must publish certain paid work, gifts, donations and other interests. This is a record of what they declared, not a suggestion that anything is wrong.
Peter Prinsley has 7 interests currently registered.
| Type | What was registered | Registered |
|---|---|---|
| Employment and earnings | medical reports - Premex Services | 25 Jul 2024 |
| Employment and earnings | medical practice - Premex | 25 Jul 2024 |
| Employment and earnings | private medical practice - Private patient payments | 25 Jul 2024 |
| Land and property (within or outside the UK) | Property in London and Norwich | 25 Jul 2024 |
| Miscellaneous | Norwich City Councillor, (unpaid since August 2024 and previously registered under Category 1) | 24 Jul 2024 |
| Employment and earnings | NHS consultant surgeon - James Paget University Hospital | 24 Jul 2024 |
| Employment and earnings | private medical practice - Peter Prinsley private medical practice | 24 Jul 2024 |
Source: Register of Members’ Financial Interests · Parliament’s own page
Questions
MPs can ask ministers questions in writing. The questions show what an MP is working on, which votes cannot.
Peter Prinsley asked 68 written questions in the last 12 months.
Who they asked
Latest questions
Source: Written Questions API · Updated 4 Oct 2026
Expenses
MPs claim back money for running an office and working in two places. An independent body, IPSA, publishes every claim. This is what was paid in 2025-26.
77 claims. For comparison, across the 657 MPs in IPSA’s file the middle MP was paid £18,469 and the average was £19,699.
Source: IPSA, individual business costs data · About this data
Election result and area
Peter Prinsley represents Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket. Here is who won there at the last general election, and a few numbers about the area.
Labour
votes ahead of second place
of people who could vote did
Peter Prinsley won with 33% of the votes, and Will Tanner (Conservative) came second with 30%.
Votes for each party
Every candidate
| Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Prinsley | Labour | 16,745 | 32.9% |
| Will Tanner | Conservative | 15,293 | 30.0% |
| Scott Hussey | Reform UK | 8,595 | 16.9% |
| Emma Buckmaster | Green Party | 5,761 | 11.3% |
| Peter McDonald | Liberal Democrat | 3,154 | 6.2% |
| Jeremy Lee | Independent | 819 | 1.6% |
| Richard Baker-Howard | Rejoin EU | 350 | 0.7% |
| Darren Turner | Communist Party of Britain | 176 | 0.3% |
2024 General Election, on today’s boundaries. Source: House of Commons Library via the Members API.
Your area at a glance
Median gross weekly pay, 2025. Source: ONS, Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings.
Share of people aged 16 to 64, August 2026. Source: ONS and DWP claimant count.
Has this changed over time?
View data table
| Month | This MP | Party average |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 25 | 100% | 100% |
| Nov 25 | 100% | 100% |
| Dec 25 | 100% | 100% |
| Jan 26 | 100% | 100% |
| Feb 26 | 100% | 100% |
| Mar 26 | 100% | 100% |
| Apr 26 | 100% | 100% |
| May 26 | 100% | 100% |
| Jun 26 | 100% | 100% |
| Jul 26 | 100% | 99% |
| Sep 26 | 100% | 100% |
Source: Commons Votes API
This page states what the record shows. It does not say why an MP voted as they did. How we calculate this